Background: The African Ministerial Conference on Environment (AMCEN) was established in 1985 and has played a crucial role in advancing environmental governance in Africa. Four decades later, the East African Community (EAC) continues to face deforestation, biodiversity loss, pollution, and reliance on biomass energy. This research examines the influence of AMCEN on the landscapes of Kenya, Uganda, and Tanzania. Methods: A mixed-method approach was employed, integrating quantitative trend analysis of forest cover, biodiversity, renewable energy, and water quality (1985-2023) with qualitative study of AMCEN pronouncements, national policies, and stakeholder perspectives. Results: Results demonstrate a steady increase in the utilization of renewable energy in the country, particularly in Tanzania and Uganda, as facilitated by policy lobbying from AMCEN. Nonetheless, the degree of forest cover, biodiversity metrics, and water quality persistently diminished, underscoring inadequate enforcement and socio-economic pressures. The qualitative findings emphasize AMCEN’s significance in strategy alignment while highlighting persistent issues with implementation, funding, and monitoring. Conclusion: AMCEN has significantly contributed to the formulation of regional agendas, the advancement of renewable energy, and the encouragement of policy implementation. Nevertheless, the extent of its authority is constrained by insufficient national capability, inadequate financing, and deficient accountability. Enhancing enforcement, broadening community initiatives, and aligning environmental actions with socio-economic development are crucial for sustainable performance.
Keywords: AMCEN, East African Community, environmental governance, biodiversity loss, renewable energy, climate resilience.
The African Ministerial Conference on the Environment (AMCEN), established in 1985 under the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), aims to harmonize policies, foster cooperation among African nations, and amplify Africa’s influence in international environmental negotiations. Over the past 40 years, AMCEN has been instrumental in shaping the agenda for environmental challenges in Africa by mobilizing resources and setting priorities across the continent. It has allocated more than US$7.7 billion to initiatives in collaboration with the Global Environment Facility (GEF) to create over 160 new protected areas and to enhance management of roughly 480 sites, encompassing around 10 percent of the continent’s total land area (GEF, 2023; UNEP, 2024). These actions highlight AMCEN’s robust capacity for agenda-setting and resource mobilization, while also reflecting its aspiration to reconcile economic development with environmental conservation.
Africa faces escalating environmental challenges such as climate change, biodiversity loss, deforestation, and pollution, which continue to jeopardize sustainable development. More than 900 million individuals depend on biomass fuels, posing health risks to vulnerable groups, particularly women and children (IEA, 2024). The circumstances in East Africa are notably dire: Kenya has experienced a loss of over one-third of its forested regions since 1990, Uganda’s forests diminished to 2 million hectares in 2017 from 4.9 million in 1990, and Tanzania continues to combat deforestation in the Eastern Arc and coastal areas (Jackson et al., 2025; FAO, 2018; Global Forest Watch, 2023; TFCG, 2023). Notwithstanding AMCEN’s promotion of renewable energy, biodiversity conservation, and community-based reforestation, biodiversity indices in Kenya, Uganda, and Tanzania declined by over 20 from 1985 to 2023, with water quality ratings diminishing to 50/100 (CBD, 2018; MacroTrends, 2023). These results illustrate the disparity between lofty claims and local socio-economic conditions, necessitating enhanced accountability, financial resources, and grassroots mobilization.
The African Ministerial Conference on the Environment (AMCEN) has functioned as a central entity for advancing environmental governance within the East African Community (EAC) over the past forty years, influencing renewable energy utilization, biodiversity conservation, afforestation, and the integration of environmental factors into national and consequently, regional development policies. Its frameworks have shaped national policies for forests and biodiversity, action plans for hydropower development in individual East African Community member states namely, Kenya, Tanzania, and Uganda, and have included national commitments, including the Sustainable Development Goals and the Convention on Biological Diversity.
However, advancement continues to be inconsistent regionally. Kenya and Tanzania have demonstrated superior outcomes, whereas Uganda has lagged in implementation, highlighting disparities in how member states operationalize the AMCEN frameworks. In the region, forests, biodiversity, and water quality continue to deteriorate despite policy enhancements. The ineffective execution, inadequate finance, and overreliance on national governments undermine AMCEN’s efficacy, hence placing rural communities, women, and youth at heightened risk of resource insecurity. In the absence of accountability, funding, and grassroots engagement, AMCEN should not anticipate functioning as anything more than a forum rather than a catalyst for significant environmental transformation in the EAC.
This study seeks to evaluate the role of the African Ministerial Conference on the Environment (AMCEN) in shaping environmental protection within the East African Community (EAC) over the past four decades. Specifically, it aims to:
- Assess AMCEN’s influence on forest cover, renewable energy adoption, biodiversity conservation, and water quality in Kenya, Uganda, and Tanzania.
- Examine how regional policy frameworks have been translated into national strategies and their effectiveness in addressing ecological decline.
- Identify the key drivers of gaps between policy commitments and measurable outcomes.
- Explore the role of community-led initiatives, particularly those involving women and youth, in advancing sustainable environmental management.
The paper has provided evidence-based insights that will guide policy and practice in environmental governance across the EAC. This analysis links ecological trends to policy effectiveness, highlighting the successes and shortcomings of AMCEN while offering lessons for enhancement based on regional frameworks. The findings are beneficial to governments, development partners, and civil society, since they illustrate how policy convergence, novel funding, and grassroots initiatives can be integrated to yield more successful outcomes. The research offers local, context-specific knowledge that aids in decision-making, resource allocation, and the sustainable development agenda, alongside the regional policy debate. Ultimately, it tackles a significant information deficiency by examining the effects of 40 years of AMCEN translation on tangible environmental outcomes.
The research employed a mixed-method strategy, incorporating quantitative trend estimation and qualitative policy assessment to assess ecological consequences and policy dynamics. The convergent parallel method was employed: quantitative data on forest cover, biodiversity, renewable energy, and water quality (1985-2023) were scrutinized, while qualitative data from AMCEN declarations, national policies, and stakeholder reports were analyzed. The findings were integrated through triangulation to ensure validity.
The three East African Community (EAC) states that were used in the study; Kenya, Uganda, and Tanzania were chosen because of their ecological diversity, accessibility of long-term data and consistent participation in AMCEN. The ecological and socio-economic importance of the mau forest complex (Kenya), the Albertine Rift ecosystem (Uganda) and the Eastern Arc mountains ecosystem and coastal ecosystems (Tanzania) were represented in case study sites.
All the data were presented based on secondary sources. The source of quantitative would be Global Forest Watch, Macro Trends, Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), the Living Planet Index as well as national reports, and qualitative data would be derived through AMCEN proceedings, environmental action plans and NGO reports. The accuracy of the sources was enhanced through cross-validation.
The qualitative data were calculated through analysis of descriptive statistics and trend comparison between countries and time. Table and visualization were created in Microsoft Excel. Qualitative data were processed in terms of the analysis of themes, where a code was created based on enforcement, financing, community participation, and policy effectiveness, which is why it is possible to combine ecological trends and governance outcomes.
This analysis indicates that AMCEN has improved the adoption of renewable energy in the EAC, with Kenya, Uganda, and Tanzania experiencing a significant growth in clean energy capacity, particularly in geothermal and hydropower. This represents a triumph of the AMCEN campaign on energy transitions to sustainable energy and adherence to global climate objectives. However, other ecological indices such as forest cover, biodiversity, and water quality have exhibited persistent decline over forty years of collaboration. Kenya and Tanzania align more closely with the AMCEN frameworks, as seen by policy modifications and reforestation efforts, but Uganda exhibits weaker implementation, reflecting inconsistencies in national execution.
These trends are substantiated by qualitative evidence: AMCEN has been pivotal in coordinating regional policies and formulating national policies; yet, its impact has been hindered by inadequate enforcement, limited budget, and weak monitoring mechanisms. Local initiatives, especially those spearheaded by women and adolescents, have demonstrated efficacy in enhancing biodiversity and forest resilience; nevertheless, they remain inadequately supported and fragmented. Overall, AMCEN has functioned effectively as an agenda-setting and coordinating platform; nevertheless, it has not yet translated commitments into measurable ecological transformations.
Table 1: Forest Cover Trends (1985–2023)
Table 1 indicates a change in forest cover in the three countries (Kenya, Uganda and Tanzania) between 1985 and 2023 according to secondary sources like Jackson et al., (2025)., Obua et al., (2010)., and Global Forest Watch (Tanzania). The findings indicate a steady decrease in the forest cover in the three nations with Kenya recording the highest losses. In spite of the fact that AMCEN has been working to facilitate sustainable forest management and align regional conservation policies over the last four decades, deforestation continues to be an issue because of the expansion of agricultural land, population and dependency on biomass energy. This is because such results underscore the imperative to enhance the policy enforcement, funding, and reforestation efforts by communities in AMCEN in order to turn around the negative trends of the forests.
Figure 1: Forest Cover (%) 1985–2023 – shows the decline in forest cover for Kenya, Uganda, and Tanzania over four decades
Table 2: Renewable Energy Share (%)
Table 2 shows that renewable energy share in Kenya, Uganda and Tanzania has increased over the years (1985-2023) wherein data has been used with a source of MacroTrends. There is a gradual rise in all three nations, with Tanzania showing the highest of 95 percent by 2023, Uganda (90 percent), and Kenya (83. 2 percent). This positive change indicates the national investments in hydropower, geothermal, and solar power with the help of the regional policy frameworks. The AMCEN has been very instrumental in pushing the transitions toward clean energy, resources mobilization and continental positions during international climate negotiations. Even so, there are still some challenges to be faced in the provision of universal access, affordability, and infrastructure resilience throughout the East African Community.
Figure 2: Renewable Energy Share (%) 1985–2023 – illustrates the increasing adoption of renewable energy in the three countries.
Table 3: Biodiversity Index (Score out of 100)
The available data on the biodiversity index of Kenya, Uganda and Tanzania between the years 1985 and 2023 is displayed in Table 3 which is based on the Convention on Biological Diversity, the Living Planet Index and local collaboration with partners. The findings indicate a consistent drop in biodiversity indices in all three nations where Kenya has fallen to 50, Uganda to 48 and Tanzania to 52. Although AMCEN implements conservation policies, designates conservation areas and balances the biodiversity strategies, the loss and poaching of habitat, and climate pressures remain the forces of decline. These results demonstrate that AMCEN needs to reinforce enforcement, financing, and community-based conservation strategies.
Figure 3: Biodiversity Index (Score out of 100) 1985–2023 – highlights the decline in biodiversity over time.
Table 4: Water Quality Index
The Water Quality Index of Kenya, Uganda, and Tanzania is tabulated during the years 2005 to 2023; synthesizing the information received in MacroTrends. The findings indicate that there is a gradual deterioration in the water quality of all the three nations but with a convergence point to 50 by 2023. This degradation is characterized by a growing level of pollution, urbanization, and runoff by agricultural activities aggravated by laxity in implementing water management policies. In spite of the fact that AMCEN has encouraged regional frameworks on sustainable use of water and transboundary management of resources, there are challenges in the implementation. The results highlight the importance of AMCEN and EAC governments to improve the control of water, investments in pollution control, and community-based water conservation projects.
Figure 4: Water Quality Index (Score out of 100) 2005–2023 – shows decreasing water quality across Kenya, Uganda, and Tanzania
As demonstrated in the analysis, AMCEN has had a positive impact on the adoption of renewable energy within the EAC since Kenya, Uganda and Tanzania have realized a substantial increase in clean energy capacity, especially geothermal and hydropower. It indicates the effectiveness of the advocacy role of AMCEN on sustainable energy transitions and compatibility with global climate objectives. Nonetheless, there is continuous degradation of other ecological indicators forest cover, biodiversity and water quality, despite forty years of collaboration. The stronger adoption of AMCEN frameworks in Kenya and Tanzania occurs through policy reforms and reforestation efforts, whereas the less intensive adoption in Uganda points to the existence of all-country inequality in the application.
These trends are supported by qualitative evidence: AMCEN has played a key role in aligning regional policies and determining national policies yet lacks impact due to poor enforcement, limited funding, and weak surveillance systems. Community-based efforts, notably women and youth have been shown to be effective in increasing biodiversity and forest resilience, but are poorly funded and under-coordinated. Altogether, AMCEN has managed to be an agenda-setting and coordinating platform and has not yet transformed commitments into quantifiable ecological benefits.
Discussion
The findings show that AMCEN has had a positive impact on environmental governance in the region, especially in promoting the use of renewable energy and reforestation policies in the EAC. The quantitative data indicates that Kenya has a considerable improvement in the renewable energy sharing of 83.2 percent, Uganda has 90 percent and Tanzania has 95 percent by 2023 through the advocacy of clean energy and harmonizing the national policies to regional systems by AMCEN (MacroTrends, 2023). Nonetheless, the fact that the forest cover, biodiversity indices, and the quality of water continue to diminish indicates the constraints of the regional power in the situation where the enforcement is weak. The success of AMCEN is subject to domestic strength, funding and political will because agricultural growth, biomass dependency and urbanization determine ecological success. In theory, these results are in line with governance approaches that emphasize the collective action to transboundary issues (Keohane and Ostrom, 1995). The comparison of evidence reveals that in Kenya and Tanzania, things have improved whereas in Uganda the results are poorer (Jackson et al., 2025), and more accountability and collaboration on the level of multilevel cooperation are required.
The resolutions of AMCE have influenced the environmental policy of the East African Community (EAC) and Kenya and Tanzania have a more consistent alignment and result. The forest reforms and biodiversity plans in Kenya are also an outcome of the AMCEN influence (Jackson et al., 2025), whereas the reforestation efforts in Tanzania emphasize AMCEN contribution to conservation in the region (Global Forest Watch, 2023; TFCG, 2023). Uganda has fallen behind, and biodiversity and forest management have worse results (Obua et al., 2010). Local initiatives, in particular, those that include women and young people, have been the most efficient (TFCG, 2023; CBD, 2018), but the lack of financing, as well as the underperformance of the monitoring, weaken the sustainability (Global Forest Watch, 2023). Global frameworks such as the SDGs and CBD are also aligned with the strategies of AMCEN (Jackson et al., 2025), but there are weak enforcement as a result of the limited capacity (Obua et al., 2010). Although the use of renewable energy has improved, there are decreases in forest cover, biodiversity, and water quality, which make it necessary to have increased accountability, funding, and implementation at the national level. In general, AMCEN has played a significant role in policy and cooperation development, although more accountability, sustainable financing, and robust implementation on a national level are needed to accomplish tangible and sustainable environmental changes (Хиасинте, 2020).
These results coincide with other part of African research, with regional environmental frameworks like the Southern African Development Community (SADC) and the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) also having made strides toward the adoption of renewable energy, which did not succeed in biodiversity and forest loss issues because of ineffective enforcement (UNEP, 2020; FAO, 2021). The experience in Southeast Asia under ASEAN has shown globally that in as much as regional platforms are able to align strategies, the final results are a matter of strong national institutions and community involvement (ADB, 2019). Therefore, the contribution aspect of AMCEN is setting of the agenda, harmonization of the policies and giving voice to Africa in the international arena, however, the actual implications are limited by the gaps in governance and resources. Theoretically, this paper strengthens environmental regionalism models, and in practice it highlights the urgent need to entrench grassroots involvement, creative financing and enhanced systems of accountability. By filling these gaps, AMCEN will be able to transform into a policy forum-driven initiative to catalyze quantifiable ecological resilience on the scale of the EAC.
This research has indicated that although AMCEN has played a positive role in establishing regional priorities and promoting the uptake of renewable energy in the East African Community; it has limited impact on the overall ecological performance. There has been a steady decrease in forest cover, biodiversity and water quality despite 40 years of policy discourse and this indicates that there is a chronic imbalance between the promises and the quantifiable outcomes. This discussion highlights that the strength of AMCEN is its ability to coordinate policy frameworks and enhance the voice of Africa in international arenas, but weak enforcement of the policies nationally, inadequate funding and socio-economic pressures such as the use of biomass energy and agricultural development have derailed the developments.
In the future, AMCEN should become more than a platform of pronouncements and a support of the real changes in the environmental policies. This involves the incorporation of more accountability systems at national and regional scales, mobilizing newer financing instruments like carbon market and green bonds, and the intensification of community-based initiatives which combine conservation and livelihoods. The experience of regional blocs such as ASEAN and SADC has shown that to achieve sustainable results, strong domestic institutions are required and also the involvement of grassroots participation. AMCEN can close the vision-reality gap by implementing monitoring, funding, and inclusive participation to guarantee long-term environmental sustainability and socio-economic sustainability throughout the East African Community.
AMCEN must focus on three strategies that are interconnected to ensure that it can better position itself as an agent of quantifiable environmental changes. It should firstly put in place strong accountability and tracking structures e.g. regional scorecards or performance audits that would monitor the progress by member states on their commitment to biodiversity, forest cover, and water quality. Transparency reporting would help not only to increase compliance, but it would also put peer pressure on the EAC governments to fulfill their responsibilities. Second, AMCEN needs to step up the process of mobilizing new financing tools such as green bonds, carbon credit markets, and blended finance models to help close the culture of persistent funding gaps that undermine mega-scale implementation. The utilization of the relationships with international donors and the private investors would also guarantee more sustainable streams of resources.
It is also important to ensure that community-led conservation and clean energy programs are scaled up to create a direct linkage between the environment and livelihoods, food security and health. Women and youth programs should be prioritized because they have proven to be effective on grassroots forest restoration and preservation of biodiversity. At the policy level, AMCEN must collaborate with the EAC to bring the regional strategies more in line with continental frameworks such as the Agenda 2063 of the African Union and global agendas such as the SDGs and Paris Agreement. With grassroot realities and high level frameworks combined and sustainable financing in place, AMCEN can move beyond the aspirational statements to actual ecological and socio-economic results.
In this study, secondary data was used by relying solely on global and regional databases, and institutional reports and policy documents. Although this was a strong method of longitudinal data, it restricted the capacity to identify real time, ground level dynamics like community perceptions, local practices of enforcing and informal patterns of using resources. Moreover, other datasets were missing or disproportionate among countries and this might have influenced cross country comparisons.
Future studies must use primary data collection methods such as household surveys, interviews with policymakers, and case studies on local effects to understand local effects further. To further capture the picture of the influence of AMCEN regionally, it would be beneficial to carry the analysis to the other EAC member states, and not just Kenya, Uganda and Tanzania. Additionally, research into new financing schemes, community-based governance and climate-related adaptation would make the policy more relevant and facilitate the conversion of AMCEN frameworks into tangible ecological and socio-economic deliverables.
References
Asian Development Bank (ADB). (2019). ASEAN’s energy cooperation and regional integration. ADB. https://www.adb.org
Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD). (2018). CBD sixth national report – Kenya. CBD. https://www.cbd.int/doc/nr/nr-06/ke-nr-06-en.pdf
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). (2018). The state of the world’s forests 2018. FAO.
Global Environment Facility (GEF). (2023). GEF in Africa: Achievements and impact. https://www.thegef.org/
Global Forest Watch. (2023). Tanzania deforestation rates & statistics. Global Forest Watch. https://www.globalforestwatch.org/dashboards/country/TZA/
International Energy Agency (IEA). (2024). Africa energy outlook 2024. IEA. https://www.iea.org
International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA). (2023). Renewable energy statistics 2023. IRENA.
Keohane, R. O., & Ostrom, E. (1995). Local commons and global interdependence: Heterogeneity and cooperation in two domains. Sage.
Living Planet Index. (2017). Biodiversity indicators: Uganda. Living Planet Index. https://www.livingplanetindex.org/about_partners
MacroTrends. (2023). Kenya, Uganda, and Tanzania: Renewable energy and water data. MacroTrends. https://www.macrotrends.net/
MacroTrends. (2025). Kenya electricity access: Historical chart & data. MacroTrends. https://www.macrotrends.net/global-metrics/countries/ken/kenya/electricity-access-statistics
MacroTrends. (2025). Uganda renewable energy statistics. MacroTrends. https://www.macrotrends.net/global-metrics/countries/uga/uganda/renewable-energy-statistics
MacroTrends. (2025). Tanzania renewable energy statistics. MacroTrends. https://www.macrotrends.net/global-metrics/countries/tza/tanzania/renewable-energy-statistics
Obua, J., Agea, J. G., & Ogwal, J. (2010). Status of forests in Uganda. African Journal of Ecology, 48(4), 853–859. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2028.2010.01217.x
Jackson, C. M., Durowoju, O. S., Adelabu, S. A., & Adeniyi, S. A. (2025). An assessment of Kenya’s forest policy and law on participatory forest management for sustainable forest management: Insights from Mt. Kenya Forest Reserve. Trees, Forests and People, 19, 100770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tfp.2024.100770
Tropical Forest Conservation Group (TFCG). (2023). Annual report 2023: Biodiversity conservation in Tanzania. TFCG. https://www.tfcg.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/TFCG-Annual-Report-2023-FINAL.pdf
United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). (2024). Forty years of AMCEN: Reflections and prospects. UNEP.
Диоманде Д.Х., Солнцев А.М. Региональное сотрудничество в области защиты окружающей среды в Африке // Африка и международное право : Монография / под ред. А.Х. Абашидзе — М: РУДН, 2020. — С. 270-285
Информация об авторе:
Лили Ндженга, аспирант кафедры международного права РУДН
Information about the author:
Lily Njenga, postgraduate student at the Department of International Law at RUDN University
Изображение: ИИ
